ABSTRACT
The decision-to-delivery interval for an emergency cesarean delivery must be as rapid and safe as possible.Preventive measures befeore,during and after operation are paramount to reduce morbidity and mortality. Periodic simulation drills are valuable to improve teamwork and communication skills.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the risk of emergency cesarean deliveries (CDs) and adverse neonatal/maternal outcomes according to the planned gestational age at delivery (GAD) for elective CD. METHODS: The study population consisted of term singleton pregnant women who were booked for elective CD and were subsequently delivered at term by CD, after excluding cases with a trial of labor. The relationship between the planned GAD, risk of emergency CD prior to planned date, and adverse neonatal/maternal outcomes were determined. RESULTS: The frequency of emergency CD, adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes were 9.5%, 4.5%, and 5.9%, respectively. The risk of emergency CD prior to the planned delivery date increased significantly according to the planned GAD (5.8% at 37 weeks, 8.2% at 38 weeks, 13.6% at 39 weeks, and 26.7% at 40 weeks or more of planned GAD, P = 0.005). Emergency CD was associated with an increased risk of adverse maternal outcomes, whereas the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes did not differ. In the total study population including both cases with elective and emergency CD, the risk of adverse maternal outcomes did not increase according to the planned GAD, and the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes decreased significantly according to the planned GAD. CONCLUSION: The risk of emergency CD increased as the planned GAD increased, but the risk of adverse maternal outcomes did not increase and the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes decreased significantly according to the planned GAD in the total study population including elective/emergency CD.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Emergencies , Gestational Age , Pregnant Women , Trial of LaborABSTRACT
Avoiding the adverse neonatal effects of perinatal asphyxia has been one of the common indications for cesarean deliveries in current obstetric practice. Expeditious delivery is dependent on decision to perform cesarean delivery and time lines achieved. A decision-delivery interval of 30 minutes, a concept initiated by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has open to debate as controversy reins about neonatal outcome when this time interval is considered in isolation. Time lines alone are probably not the only criteria to be employed, and may contribute to errors in interpretation by professional regulatory bodies and the society at large. Procedures prior to decision making like trial of labour, fetal scalp sampling and readily available resources for instituting emergent cesarean delivery invariably need to be considered. Though decision to delivery time is an integral component of critical conduct intervals in the acutely compromised fetus, a more pragmatic approach needs to be taken considering potential and known logistical and obstetric factors in line with good obstetric practice.